Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher.
Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?
Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.
-
Abstract Concentrations of total dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) in freshwater ecosystems are controlled by terrestrial inputs and a myriad of in situ processes, such as aquatic metabolism. Dissolved CO2is one of the components of DIC, and its dynamics are also regulated by chemical equilibrium with the DIC pool, so‐called carbonate buffering. Although its importance is generally recognized, carbonate buffering is still not consistently accounted for in freshwater studies. Here, we review key concepts in freshwater carbonate buffering, perform simulation experiments, and provide a case study of an alkaline river to illustrate calculations of DIC from CO2. These analyses demonstrate that carbonate buffering can alter common interpretations of CO2data, including carbon–oxygen coupling through production and respiration. As direct measurements of dissolved CO2are increasingly common, accounting for CO2equilibria with DIC is critical to understanding its role in carbon cycling within most freshwater systems.more » « less
-
The Upper Clark Fork River (UCFR) Long Term Research in Environmental Biology (LTREB) umbrella monitoring project generating these data is conducted separately and complementarily to the 200-million-dollar (USD) superfund project for ecological restoration of the UCFR, associated tributaries, and head water streams including Silver Bow and Warm Springs Creeks. Restoration along the UCFR in western Montana includes removal of metal-laden floodplain soils, lowering of the floodplain to its original elevation, and re-vegetation of over 70 km of the river’s floodplain closest to contaminant sources. The UCFR LTREB project includes bi-weekly water quality monitoring across the first 200 km of the river and its major tributaries along a gradient of heavy metal contamination associated with historic mining. Monitoring includes inorganic phosphorus and nitrogen concentrations, biotic standing stocks, and dissolved and whole-water heavy metal concentrations. The monitoring program began in 2017 with funding extended through 2028. The original analytical intent for these data was to assess the response of river dissolved organic carbon to the floodplain restoration. Data are total organic carbon combustion analyses (Shimadzu Scientific Instruments) of the concentration of organic carbon dissolved in filtered samples of well-mixed river thalweg water. Data are from the 2024 water year (1 Oct 2023 to 30 Sep 2024) from samples collected on the Upper Clark Fork River (USGS HUC 17010201) at project sites distributed along the river from the vicinity of Anaconda to Missoula, Montana, USA.more » « less
-
The Upper Clark Fork River (UCFR) Long Term Research in Environmental Biology (LTREB) umbrella monitoring project generating these data is conducted separately and complementarily to the 200-million-dollar (USD) superfund project for ecological restoration of the UCFR, associated tributaries, and head water streams including Silver Bow and Warm Springs Creeks. Restoration along the UCFR in western Montana includes removal of metal-laden floodplain soils, lowering of the floodplain to its original elevation, and re-vegetation of over 70 km of the river’s floodplain closest to contaminant sources. The UCFR LTREB project includes bi-weekly water quality monitoring across the first 200 km of the river and its major tributaries along a gradient of heavy metal contamination associated with historic mining. Monitoring includes inorganic phosphorus and nitrogen concentrations, biotic standing stocks, and dissolved and whole-water heavy metal concentrations. The monitoring program began in 2017 with funding extended through 2028. The original analytical intent for these data was to assess the response of river dissolved organic carbon to the floodplain restoration. Data are primarily Aurora Total Organic Carbon combustion analyses of the concentration of organic carbon dissolved in filtered samples of well-mixed river thalweg water. A few samples from the final campaign in the dataset were analyzed with a Shimadzu instrument using a similar method. Data are from the 2022 water year (1 Oct 2021 to 30 Sep 2022) from samples collected on the Upper Clark Fork River (USGS HUC 17010201) at project sites distributed along the river from the vicinity of Anaconda to Missoula, Montana, USA.more » « less
-
The Upper Clark Fork River (UCFR) Long Term Research in Environmental Biology (LTREB) umbrella monitoring project generating these data is conducted separately and complementarily to the 200-million-dollar (USD) superfund project for ecological restoration of the UCFR, associated tributaries, and head water streams including Silver Bow and Warm Springs Creeks. Restoration along the UCFR in western Montana includes removal of metal-laden floodplain soils, lowering of the floodplain to its original elevation, and re-vegetation of over 70 km of the river’s floodplain closest to contaminant sources. The UCFR LTREB project includes bi-weekly water quality monitoring across the first 200 km of the river and its major tributaries along a gradient of heavy metal contamination associated with historic mining. Monitoring includes inorganic phosphorus and nitrogen concentrations, biotic standing stocks, and dissolved and whole-water heavy metal concentrations. The monitoring program began in 2017 with funding extended through 2028. The original analytical intent for these data was to assess the response of river dissolved organic carbon to the floodplain restoration. Data are total organic carbon combustion analyses (Shimadzu Scientific Instruments) of the concentration of organic carbon dissolved in filtered samples of well-mixed river thalweg water. Data are from the 2023 water year (1 Oct 2022 to 30 Sep 2023) from samples collected on the Upper Clark Fork River (USGS HUC 17010201) at project sites distributed along the river from the vicinity of Anaconda to Missoula, Montana, USA.more » « less
-
Abstract Measurements of riverine dissolved inorganic carbon, total alkalinity (AT), pH, and the partial pressure of carbon dioxide (pCO2) can provide insights into the biogeochemical function of rivers, including the processes that control biological production, chemical speciation, and air‐water CO2fluxes. The complexity created by these combined processes dictates that studies of inorganic carbon be made over broad spatial and temporal scales. Time‐series data like these are relatively rare, however, because sampling and measurements are labor intensive and, for some variables, good measurement quality is difficult to achieve (e.g., pH). In this study, spectrophotometric pH and ATwere quantified with high precision and accuracy at biweekly to monthly intervals over a four‐year period (2018–2021) along 216 km of the Upper Clark Fork River (UCFR) in the northern Rocky Mountains, USA. We use these and other time‐series data to provide insights into the processes that control river inorganic carbon, with a focus onpCO2and air‐water CO2fluxes. We found that seasonal snowmelt runoff increasedpCO2and that expected increase and decrease ofpCO2due to seasonal heating and cooling were likely offset by an increase and loss of algal biomass, respectively. Overall, the UCFR was a small net source (0.08 ± 0.14 mol m−2 d−1) of CO2to the atmosphere over the four‐year study period with highly variable annual averages (0.0–0.10 mol m−2 d−1). The seasonally correlated, offsetting mechanisms highlight the challenges in predictingpCO2and air‐water CO2fluxes in rivers.more » « less
-
Abstract Rivers efficiently collect, process, and transport terrestrial‐derived carbon. River ecosystem metabolism is the primary mechanism for processing carbon. Diel cycles of dissolved oxygen (DO) have been used for decades to infer river ecosystem metabolic rates, which are routinely used to predict metabolism of carbon dioxide (CO2) with uncertainties of the assumed stoichiometry ranging by a factor of 4. Dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) has been less used to directly infer metabolism because it is more difficult to quantify, involves the complexity of inorganic carbon speciation, and as shown in this study, likely requires a two‐station approach. Here, we developed DIC metabolism models using single‐ and two‐station approaches. We compared metabolism estimates based on simultaneous DO and DIC monitoring in the Upper Clark Fork River (USA), which also allowed us to estimate ecosystem‐level photosynthetic and respiratory quotients (PQEand RQE). We observed that metabolism estimates from DIC varied more between single‐ and two‐station approaches than estimates from DO. Due to carbonate buffering, CO2is slower to equilibrate with the atmosphere compared to DO, likely incorporating a longer distance of upstream heterogeneity. Reach‐averaged PQEranged from 1.5 to 2.0, while RQEranged from 0.8 to 1.5. Gross primary production from DO was larger than that from DIC, as was net ecosystem production by . The river was autotrophic based on DO but heterotrophic based on DIC, complicating our understanding of how metabolism regulated CO2production. We suggest future studies simultaneously model metabolism from DO and DIC to understand carbon processing in rivers.more » « less
-
This package provides necessary supporting data and models for the manuscript titled "Divergent metabolism estimates from dissolved oxygen and inorganic carbon: implications for river carbon cycling". The entire dataset consists of sensor data collected at three reaches and metabolism estimates from different models. The sensor data include partial pressure of carbon dioxide in water, dissolved oxygen and temperature. At each reach, we established a two station approach, meaning at least one pair of sensor suits were distributed upstream and downstream. Results for metabolism estimates differ by solutes (i.e., oxygen or carbon based) and modelling approaches (i.e., single station or two station approach). In addition to data products, we also provide R packages for metabolism models.more » « less
-
Abstract Stream solute tracers are commonly injected to assess transport and transformation in study reaches, but results are biased toward the shortest and fastest storage locations. While this bias has been understood for decades, the impact of an experimental constraint on our understanding has yet to be considered. Here, we ask how different our understanding of reach‐ and segment‐scale transport would be if our empirical limits were extended. We demonstrate a novel approach to manipulate experimental conditions and observe mass that is stored at timescales beyond the traditional reach‐scale window of detection. We are able to explain the fate of an average of 26% of solute tracer mass that would have been considered as “lost” in a traditional study design across our 14 replicates, extending our detection limits to characterize flowpaths that would have been previously unmeasured. We demonstrate how this formerly lost mass leads to predicting lower magnitudes of gross gains and losses in individual reaches, and ultimately show that the network turnover we infer from solute tracers represents an upper limit on actual, expected behavior. Finally, we review the evolution of tracer studies and their interpretation including this approach and provide a proposed future direction to extend empirical studies to not‐before‐seen timescales.more » « less
An official website of the United States government
